PAKISTAN'S EMERGING MIDDLE POWER BEHAVIOR: MEDIATION DIPLOMACY AND STRATEGIC BALANCING IN ASIAN GEOPOLITICS (2025–2026)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21843502Keywords:
Asian Geopolitics, Emerging Middle Powers, Geo-Economics, Mediation Diplomacy, Middle Power Theory, Pakistan Foreign Policy, Strategic Balancing, U.S.–Iran CrisisAbstract
This article examines the evolving nature of Pakistan's middle power behavior in the contemporary geopolitical landscape of Asia, through the lens of Middle power theory. The study particularly focusing on the role of mediation diplomacy and strategic balancing during the 2025-2026. The study is theoretically grounded on the behavioral approaches to middle power which is developed by Cooper, Higgott and Nossal (1993), Jordaan (2003) and Efstathopoulos (2023) to highlights that Pakistan's foreign policy behavior in recent years has been reflected with the functional traits of emerging middle powers. In particular, Pakistan has been increasingly active in its diplomacy, including co-facilitating the U.S.-Iran crisis talks in 2026, engaging in strategic dialogue with China and the United States, and actively participating in multilateral institutions and geo-economic efforts to promote regional connectivity and cooperation. Employing a qualitative research design, the study relies on content analysis and thematic analysis of official policy documents, diplomatic communiqués, government statements, and relevant academic literature. The findings of the study indicate that Pakistan is increasingly using diplomatic entrepreneurship, mediation, coalition building, strategic balancing, and regional stabilization as tools of influence in a changing multipolar regional order. The article contributes to the emerging literature on emerging middle powers by analyzing how diplomatic agency, strategic positioning and mediation capacity can offset the material limitations in a competitive geopolitical context. The study highlights that Pakistan is not a typically considered as middle power in terms of its economic or military power, but its recent developments in foreign policy clearly suggest that it has a growing ability to foster diplomatic engagement, de-escalate strategic tensions, facilitate collective actions, and influence regional dynamics. The study also recommends institutionalizing Pakistan's middle power diplomacy by strengthening diplomatic capacity, enhancing strategic autonomy, and expanding engagement with regional multilateral institutions to sustain its emerging role in Asian geopolitics. The study concludes that Pakistan is increasingly functioning as an emerging middle power whose diplomatic activism, strategic balancing, and geo-economic engagement enhance its ability to contribute to regional stability and order in contemporary Asia.
References
Afzal, S. (2026, May 21). How Pakistan became the world's most useful middle power. Asia Times. https://asiatimes.com/2026/05/how-pakistan-became-the-worlds-most-useful-middle-power/
Al Jazeera. (2026, May 12). Trump backs Pakistan as Iran mediator after criticism from Lindsey Graham. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/5/12/trump-backs-pakistan-as-iran-mediator-after-criticism-from-lindsey-graham
Al Jazeera. (2026, May 26). Pakistan and China reach new broad consensus on boosting ties. https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2026/5/26/pakistan-and-china-reach-new-broad-consensus-on-boosting-ties
Anadolu Agency. (2026). Iranian president arrives in Pakistan on first overseas trip since war with US, Israel. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/us-israel-iran-war/iranian-president-arrives-in-pakistan-on-1st-overseas-trip-since-war-with-us-israel/3975447
Ashraf, S. (2026). The strategic tightrope: Pakistan's role in a shifting global order.
Bashir, O. (2023). Pakistan's evolving foreign policy amid emerging multipolarity. Centre for Strategic and Contemporary Research. https://cscr.pk/explore/themes/politics-governance/pakistans-evolving-foreign-policy-amid-emerging-multipolarity/
Bercovitch, J., & Houston, A. (2000). Why do they do it like this? An analysis of the factors influencing mediation behavior in international conflicts. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 44(2), 170–202.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Chattha, A. L. (2023). Foreign policy of Pakistan: Major determinants and relations with countries. Global Foreign Policies Review, 6(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.31703/gfpr.2023(VI-II).10
Cooper, A. F., Higgott, R. A., & Nossal, K. R. (1993). Relocating middle powers: Australia and Canada in a changing world order. UBC Press.
Dawn. (2026). Pakistan's diplomatic role in U.S.–Iran crisis. Dawn. https://www.dawn.com
Efstathopoulos, C. (2023). Global IR and the middle power concept: Exploring different paths to agency. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 77(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2023.2191925
Embassy of the People's Republic of China in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. (2026, May 26). Joint statement between the People's Republic of China and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan. https://pk.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/zbgx/202605/t20260528_11919306.htm
Glaser, B. S., & Funaiole, M. P. (2024, October 9). Seeking agency in uncertainty: Asian middle powers and a fragmenting global order. Asia Society Policy Institute. https://asiasociety.org/policy-institute/seeking-agency-uncertainty-asian-middle-powers-and-fragmenting-global-order
Goh, E. (2007). Great powers and hierarchical order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing regional security strategies. International Security, 32(3), 113–157.
Government of Pakistan. (2022). National security policy of Pakistan 2022–2026. National Security Division.
Haqqani, H. (2005). Pakistan: Between mosque and military. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Heiduk, F., & Wacker, G. (2020). From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific: Significance, implementation and challenges. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
Holbraad, C. (1984). Middle powers in international politics. Macmillan.
Ihsan, N., & Khalid, I. (2026). SCO and Pakistan's foreign policy shift: A study of challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Special Education, 41(8S), 1123–1140.
https://internationalsped.com/index.php/ijse/article/view/3501
Ikenberry, G. J., & Mastanduno, M. (Eds.). (2003). International relations theory and the Asia-Pacific. Columbia University Press.
Jamali, A. B., & Hussain, M. (2026). Examining Pakistan's strategic hedging between the United States and China. Pacific Focus, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.70027
Jordaan, E. (2003). The concept of a middle power in international relations: Distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers. Politikon, 30(2), 165–181.
Kang, D. C. (2007). China rising: Peace, power, and order in East Asia. Columbia University Press.
Khalid, A., Hassan, Z., Hameed, N., & Khan, M. (2026). Pakistan as a global mediator: An analytical study of the 2026 Islamabad Accords between the US and Iran. Pakistan
Journal of Social Science Review, 5(6), 349–363.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Maqsood, A. (2026). Leveraging regional supply chains for strategic connectivity: Pakistan's path to middle power status. Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad. https://issi.org.pk/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/6_Asia_Maqsood_SS_No._1_2025.pdf
Medcalf, R. (2020). Indo-Pacific empire: China, America and the contest for the world's pivotal region. Manchester University Press.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Government of Pakistan. (2025). SIFC & economic diplomacy. https://mofa.gov.pk/sifc-economic-diplomacy
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Government of Pakistan. (2026a, June 15). Message from the Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister on the 25th anniversary of the SCO.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Government of Pakistan. (2026b, June 20). Technical-level talks under the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Government of Pakistan. (2026c, June 22). Joint statement by the State of Qatar and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan regarding the Lake Lucerne Summit.
Ministry of Transport of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2024, March). Uzbekistan–Afghanistan–Pakistan railway construction project. Ministry of Transport of the Republic of Uzbekistan.
Rasool, A., & Niazi, A. (2026). The unlikely broker: Pakistan's diplomatic breakthrough in the US–Iran conflict (2026). Global Foreign Policies Review, 9(2).
Rizvi, H. A. (2019). Pakistan and the geopolitical environment: A study of foreign policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
Shahid, T., & Hayat, U. (2026). Strategic agency or structural constraint: Civil-military relations in Pakistan's foreign policy (2010–2020). Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, 5(3), 147–160.
Small, A. (2020, September 23). Returning to the shadows: China, Pakistan, and the fate of CPEC (Asia Program Report No. 16). German Marshall Fund of the United States. https://www.gmfus.org/sites/default/files/Small%20-%20China%20Pakistan%20CPEC%20-%2023%20September.pdf
Touval, S., & Zartman, I. W. (1985). International mediation in theory and practice. Westview Press.
United Nations. (2024). UN peacekeeping contributors. https://peacekeeping.un.org/en/troop-and-police-contributors
Usmani, S. (2025, June 14). Regional connectivity: Tajikistan's race to finish CASA-1000 by 2026. Modern Diplomacy. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2025/06/14/regional-
connectivity-tajikistans-race-to-finish-casa-1000-by-2026/
Wolf, S. O. (2020). The China–Pakistan Economic Corridor of the Belt and Road Initiative: Concept, context and assessment. Springer.
Yusuf, M. (2026). Pakistan's strategic repositioning and middle power ambitions in the post-2025 Asian order. Contemporary South Asia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shahar Bano, Imran Ali Mahar, Abdul Basit (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

